By: Janey B
In a recent interview with Jesper Johansson of Perspektiv, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich revealed the mechanism for bringing the criminals who have perpetuated egregious crimes against all of us, to justice. Styled on a United States Grand Jury investigation, Fuellmich and his team wanted to be sure to have the appropriate legal strategy to “catch everyone involved in this”. The answer is in the concept of “Common Design”.
The Nuremberg Trials utilized the charge of “Common Design” or ” Common Plan” or conspiracy. This meant “the defendants were responsible for all actions committed by anyone carrying out the plan.
The specific charges brought against these men have their origins in the Treaty of London 1945. As stated previously, the Charter of the Tribunal granted jurisdiction over crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, and over conspiracy to commit the crimes as they were defined in the Charter (Paulson, 1975, 138).
The following articles discussed in the agreement are particularly salient, as they defined the newly established crimes that the Nazi leaders would be tried under.
Article 6(a) defines “crimes against peace”:
Crimes Against Peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation, or waging a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing. (Paulson, p. 138)
Article 6(c) defines “crimes against humanity”:
“Crimes Against Humanity: namely murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. (Paulson, 1975, p. 139)
Lastly, a statement dealing with conspiracy appears in a paragraph following article 6(c) of the charter. Note that under this particular charge, the defendants were responsible for all actions committed by anyone carrying out the plan. Leaders, organizers, instigators, and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a Common Plan or Conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan. (Paulson, 1975, p. 139) (emphasis added.)
Judah Murray | Natural Law and Legal Positivism in the Nuremberg Trials
The announcement came just days after Dr. Michael Yeadon, ex-Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, presented damning evidence that batches/lots of these experimental treatments are inconsistently formulated from lot to lot, with the most dangerous formulations being more widely distributed across the United States.
It is the conclusion of Yeadon and his colleagues, and also the legal team on the Corona Investigative Committee that “[pharma companies] are experimenting with lethal dosages, trying to find out how best to kill us.”
Fuellmich states “all these factors combined result in what Klaus Schwab calls ‘malicious infliction of harm'”, and “no one is going to escape. All are going to be indicted. You’re all going to have to pay damage because there is no immunity if you come to the conclusion that we have, intentional, intentional, malicious infliction of harm”.
There are certain lots that are extremely lethal – deadly, and [Mike Yeadon] followed these lots throughout the United States. Turns out that those lots that are least harmless were only used in about 2 or 3 of the states, (the United States – there’s 50 of them, as we all know) but those that turned out to be extremely lethal – with death figures of 1000 or more, they were used in 32, 34, 36 of the states of the United States.
And what this boils down to, (and this cannot be a coincidence we do not have an innocent explanation for this) is that the 3 manufacturers which he and his team took a close look at, that is; BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, that they are experimenting with lethal dosages. They are trying to find out which dosage is lethal because, and this is what it boils down to, this is about population reduction.
If you’re going to use deadly doses right from the start that’s going to scare off everyone, that’s why they are experimenting with the right dose that’ll kill off 10%, or 50%, or 20%, we’ll learn more about this, but this means, in the legal analysis; this is negligence. They are not making mistakes here, there is no innocent explanation for this. This is, as Mike Yeadon put it, and we agree with that as lawyers, this is compelling evidence for premeditated mass murder.
And what this translates into in the legal cases, in the United States for example, what this leads into is not just damages – but punitive damages. Remember, you are dealing with a bad actor who is intentionally doing something harmful, and that is what we are dealing with here.
It is the makers of the vaccines, the politicians who advertise them, the mainstream media, the doctors who administer the shots, they’re all in it and of course, these huge pharmaceutical and tech companies who are in it – they’re going to have to feel the pain from this and that’s what punitive damages are there for. You don’t just get the actual damage that you’ve suffered.
We believe that it’s at least, simply everyone suffered damage and it’s at least $1,000,000 per person, but if you add on punative damages; 21 x the actual damage, 50 x, maybe 1000x the original damage because these are very terrible crimes against humanity, we are not just talking about regular crimes.
If you add this, onto this; this means the defendants in the cases that are now coming up will not be able to pay for this – so we are going to have to take them apart.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich | Perspektiv (10/01/2022)
The perpetrators have been able to commit this extreme act of violence against the global population by claiming as “scientific fact”, 3 deceitful “big lies”, unchallenged by corporate media, senior public servants, and members of parliament globally.
- Asymptomatic transmission: there is no asymptomatic transmission. This is a lie created by Prof. Christian Drosten (who is not a professor.)
- PCR testing regime: The test incapable of testing for anything. A DNA replicator, not a diagnostic test – guaranteed to produce false positives, and of course, “cases”.
- Safe and effective vaccines: These injections are neither safe, nor effective, and do not immunise the injected. (They are also still under emergency use not having concluded human trials.)
Fuellmich explained Mike Yeadon said at his latest appearance at the Corona Investigative Committee, that there is a law in the United States against “adulterated product”, and everyone involved is found liable.
Earlier this month, the CEO of an insurance company in Indiana revealed that new figures indicate that over the span of the past year, excess mortality has risen to 40% because of government inflicted measures including lockdowns and “vaccinations”.
According to Fuellmich, the rationale of the trial is to get as many people as possible to hear the evidence and legal analysis so they understand, “they have not only a right to resist, but a duty to resist. They have to defend themselves; they have to stand up.”
How bad is my Covid-19 Vaccine Batch? – Find out now (thanks to Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar TG channel for the link.)
Redacted Advance Purchase Agreement | Pfizer/BioNTech
Unredacted Advance Purchase Agreement | Pfizer/BioNTech
The Pfizer Innoculations Do More Harm Than Good (PDF)
Pfizer’s Documents – Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PDF)
Keep up to date, follow: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich TG channel (English)