Distressing reports emerged Saturday, on Telegram, alleging year 12 students lost their lives after getting experimental Covid injections in Sydney.
The disturbing claim aired on Stew Peter’s interview with Royal Australian Air Force veteran, Alan Hennessy (and was reported in independent media outlets globally), alleging three year 12 students (two males and one female) died after receiving shots. This followed earlier reports alleging three participants had “collapsed”.
Another came from retired Queensland police officer, Kent Brown, in a video posted on Telegram over the weekend. Brown was speaking to a meeting about a new initiative. “The Australia Project”, aimed at defending the sovereignty of all Australians. He stated (in part):
I can assure you that the law of our nation describes our political leaders as nothing more than criminals. We’ve got 2 kids dead from the vaccinations in Sydney and not a word of it on the news. Okay? If that doesn’t wake you up…
In late July, New South Wales Department of Health, in collaboration with New South Wales Department of Education announced a mass vaccination program for year 12 students:
Pfizer doses are being redistributed to south west and western Sydney due to the need to vaccinate Year 12 students in the LGAs most affected by the current COVID-19 outbreak and reduce the risk of the virus escaping into the regions from one of their household contacts, such as an authorised worker.
Up to 40,000 Pfizer doses will be allocated from NSW Health’s rural and regional supply of COVID-19 vaccine to help Year 12 students in south west and western Sydney get back to school for face-to-face learning on 16 August.
It’s been difficult for students trying to complete their high school studies. Government Covid restrictions have severely impacted not only schooling, but caused deep mental scars for many. Psychologist’s are reporting increasing instances of self-harm and suicidal thoughts, exacerbated by lack of medical assistance, also resulting from Covid policy. Together with onerous protective measures (including wearing masks at school and during exams), the promise of a “safe vaccine” and return to a more normal way of life must be tempting. It shouldn’t cost their lives.
A Damnable Deception?
NB: *Standard confirmation of acute SARS-CoV-2 infections is based on the detection of unique viral sequences by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), such as real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR).
For 18 months, we have been assaulted daily with an unrelenting barrage of hysterical Covid reporting by mainstream media. Primarily driving this, is new cases, not excessive deaths and Covid cases are determined by a single positive r/RT-PCR test (PCR).
This is problematic because the inventor, Kary Mullis said it was not intended to be used as a diagnostic tool. It is not capable of determining whether a person has an active Covid infection, because it doesn’t test for SarsCov2 (it can’t, but we’ll get to that).
Last November (totally ignored by MSM), an appeals court in Portugal ruled the PCR test to be up to 97% unreliable.
The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.
They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.
The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.
Swiss Policy Research said in October 2020:
The issues with PCR tests are numerous:
1. There can be large-scale test kit contamination, as both the US and the UK (and several African countries) discovered during the early phase of the pandemic.
2. There can be testing site or lab contamination, which has led to countless false positive results, school closures, nursing home quarantines, canceled sports events, and more.
3. The PCR test can react to other coronaviruses. According to lab examinations, this happens in about 1% to 3% of cases if only one target gene is tested, as is the case in many (but not all) labs and as the WHO itself has recommended to avoid ambiguous positive/negative test results.
4. The PCR test can detect non-infectious virus fragments weeks after an active infection, or from an infection of a contact person, as the US CDC confirmed.
5. The PCR test can detect viable virus in quantities too small to be infectious (see below).
Dr. Sam Bailey made this video explaining it in layman’s terms.
In January, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich lodged a cease and desist order against Drosten which stated (in part):
Our client has suffered and continues to suffer significant harm as a result of the grossly disproportionate measures imposed to contain the COVID-19 pandemic without an evidence-based foundation.
You are personally responsible for this harm because, as one of the individuals who intervened significantly and decisively in the policy deliberations, you stated facts which you knew to be false and still continue to do so, and, also intentionally, you concealed, and continue to conceal significant facts.
How can government continue to claim a state of emergency exists, when the mechanism driving the ‘pandemic’ is flawed, and demonstrably not fit for purpose?
Isolation of SarsCov2
For over 12 months, Christine Massey (a bio-statistician based in Ontario, Canada) has been conducting a significant ongoing study. Under Freedom of Information (FOI) Massey and others wrote to some 90 international health, science, and government organisations asking for confirmation the SarsCov2 virus was “isolated” and “purified”.
It seems no “isolated” or “purified” sample exists. Isolate Truth Fund has 1.5 million euro to give anyone who produces an isolated SarsCov2 virus. No takers yet.
Link to: The Virus Does NOT exist | Gemma O’Doherty the video referred to by Massey during the discussion above.
- Freedom of Information reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever
You won’t see this reported by MSM because if there is no isolated virus, how can they test for it? How can the experimental jabs be ‘vaccines’? These are not traditional vaccines, though the label clearly makes them more acceptable to the public. It is reasonable to ask why state and federal governments are disregarding this evidence?.
How ‘Safe’ Are They?
Claims the “vaccine” is killing more people than Covid” are now appearing in independent media. How are Australian’s faring? Well, according to TGA figures:
|Pharmaceutical||Number of reports (cases)||Number of cases with a single suspected medicine||Number of cases where death was a reported outcome|
|COMIRNATY COVID-19 vaccine |
|17, 455||17, 164||171|
|COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca |
(ChAdOx1-S (Viral vector))
|28, 956||28, 579||259|
|COVID-19 Vaccine (TNS) |
(COVID-19 Vaccine (Type not specified))
|46, 708||46, 029||449|
Finding data for Covid deaths over the same period proved to be challenging. Data we could find on the federal government website was culmulative, from the beginning of the pandemic.
Acknowledgement of collaborating colleagues: Anthony Macali (@migga), Jessica Urquhart (@COVID_Australia) and Joanna Wu (@wileam).
The last reported death for 2020 was 28 December. First reported death for 2021 was 13/04/2021. 30 reported deaths from Covid 01/01/2021 – 08/08/2021. 41 deaths reported 10/08/2021 – 22/08/2021. 4 deaths were reported, but no dates were given. If these figures are correct, we have had 75 deaths from (or attributed to) Covid, but 449 deaths following a Covid jab. Only 9 deaths occurred in people under 60. Figures do not indicate whether people had received the shots.
Vaccination Likely Won’t Set You Free
The World Health Organisation (WHO) – December 2020:
Speaking at a press conference, WHO’s chief scientist Dr Soumya Swaminathan said there was yet to be any evidence that coronavirus vaccines were “going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on”.
“We need to assume that people who have been vaccinated also need to take the same precautions till there‘s a certain level of herd immunity. This is a dynamic in an evolving field,” she said, according to Nine newspapers.
In May, Biden’s press secretary said social distancing and masks would continue even after vaccination. Here in Australia, experts are warning restrictions could last for “years“, even after most of the population get the shot. Nearly half of the people catching the “Delta variant” in Israel are fully vaccinated. It doesn’t stop transmission or infection of the “more virulent variants”, clearly. Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex Chief Science Officer and VP at Pfizer has refuted the claim that variants are more deadly, stating that mutations usually weaken, but become more transmissible.
Dr. Yeadon has been outspoken about the experimental Covid vaccines, not as an “anti-vaxxer”, but a a virologist and immunologist highly qualified in his field. He also specifically warned women to avoid the shots, especially if they are planning a family.
Prof. Dolores Cahill, an award winning virologist and immunologist with impressive credentials, warns that these experimental treatments could cause a hyperactive immune response (also known as antibody-dependent enhancement or ADE). Recently Extra.ie reported a warrant was issued in England, for Cahill’s arrest. So much for scientific debate.
Our ministers and unelected public servants seem determined to force Australians to participate in, what amounts to, unpaid drug trials. Not content with putting adults at risk, they have now moved on to kids, with plans to inject 12 – 16 year old children. Whether we want it or not.
What do you think? Do you think the risk is justified? Will you get the shot? Would you want your children to get the shot? Please make sure you let your local MP’s know what you think.
* Reference: Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2